And the verdict: Cheney won. Personally I expected Edwards to be good. I didn't expect him to cowed or timid. He's a TRIAL LAWYER, people. Timid ain't in the job description. So I'm not "impressed" that Edwards wasn't timid, which seems to be what makes most people think Edwards did a good job. He was fine style wise, but he wasn't up to Cheney's level on you know...the knowledge thing.
Admittedly, I do have a bias for Cheney. Obviously smart, detail oriented men with a dry sense of humor enthrall me, especially when they mention things like ricin.
But will this debate change anything? Not a fraction of a percentage point.
Incidentally Gwen Ifill was a fine moderator. Better than Lehrer. Perhaps the number two is angling for the top job after all...
1 comment:
Detail oriented? Yeah, like WMD, the addresses of web sites, remembering people you've met, making sure you get your Haliburton money the day *before* you get sworn in...detail is sooo important.
Post a Comment